Standard Operating Procedure // Integrity

Editorial
Integrity

Executive Summary
RatedCinema is an antidote to algorithmic hype. We maintain a rigorous, human-led standard of film criticism grounded in technical proficiency and narrative soul.
Cinematic lens focus
* INDEPENDENT STANCE * NO PAID REVIEWS * 5-PILLAR RUBRIC * NO SPANISH JUNKETS * TOTAL DISCLOSURE * INDEPENDENT STANCE *
Truth in Criticism Methodology Over Hype The Review Ethics Pact Truth in Criticism Methodology Over Hype

Our Hard Lines

Transparency is not a buzzword; it is our operational framework. We disclose the mechanics of our influence so you can trust our conclusions.

01

Zero Studio Influence

Our critics are strictly prohibited from accepting travel, lodging, or gifts from film studios or PR agencies. If a reviewer attends a press screening, RatedCinema covers all associated costs to ensure the critique remains untainted by hospitality.

02

The Editorial Wall

We maintain a total separation between our commercial partnerships and our editorial desk. Our advertising team has zero visibility into review scores or editorial schedules. A film’s presence as a site sponsor has no bearing on its eventual rating.

03

Disclosure Protocol

While we prefer reviewers with zero personal ties to a production, we recognize that the film industry is interconnected. Any personal or professional relationship between a writer and a cast or crew member will be explicitly disclosed at the top of the review.

"A score is a summary of the argument, not a substitute for the reasoning."

The 5-Point Rubric

How we map cinematic merit

Every film reviewed on RatedCinema is cross-referenced against five technical and artistic pillars. This ensures consistency whether we are covering an avant-garde short or a multi-billion dollar franchise.

1

Narrative Architecture

Evaluation of screenplay structure, pacing, and thematic cohesion. We look for intent and execution over mere plot mechanics.

2

Technical Craft

Analysis of cinematography, lighting, sound design, and editing. We value the marriage of aesthetic choice and narrative function.

3

Performance & Direction

The chemistry of the cast and the clarity of the director's vision. We reward risk-taking and authentic characterization.

4

Cultural Permanence

Does the work contribute to the cinematic dialogue? We assess if the film has the weight to endure beyond its release window.

5

The 'Cinema' Quotient

The intangible feeling of seeing a master at work. Does this production utilize the medium of film to its fullest potential?

The Scale

  • 9.0 – 10 MASTERPIECE
  • 7.5 – 8.9 EXCEPTIONAL
  • 6.0 – 7.4 RECOMMENDED
  • 4.0 – 5.9 COMPETENT
  • 0.1 – 3.9 FLAWED

Note: We revisit major ratings every 5 years to ensure our archive reflects historical perspective. Last policy review: May 2026.

Trust & Standards Resources

DOCUMENT

The Spoiler Protocol

Our commitment to protecting your first viewing experience through tiered disclosure.

Read Policy
INTERNAL

Peer Review Cycle

How our editorial board challenges consensus scores before they go live on the site.

Our Process
CORRECTIONS

Correction Log

Full transparency on factual updates and score revisions across our 10-year archive.

View Logs

Questions on Integrity?

If you have concerns about a specific review or have questions regarding our ethics policy, please reach out to our editorial director directly.

RatedCinema HQ: 456 Movie Boulevard, New York, NY 10001, USA